Running Your Flask Application Over HTTPS

Posted by
on under

While you work on your Flask application, you normally run the development web server, which provides a basic, yet functional WSGI complaint HTTP server. But eventually you will want to deploy your application for production use, and at that time, one of the many things you will need to decide is if you should require clients to use encrypted connections for added security.

People ask me all the time about this, in particular how to expose a Flask server on HTTPS. In this article I'm going to present several options for adding encryption to a Flask application, going from an extremely simple one that you can implement in just five seconds, to a robust solution that should give you an A+ rating like my site gets from this exhaustive SSL analysis service.


How Does HTTPS Work?

The encryption and security functionality for HTTP is implemented through the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. Basically put, TLS defines a standard way to make any network communication channel secure. Since I'm not a security expert, I don't think I can do a great job if I try to give you a detailed description of the TLS protocol, so I will just give you some of the details that are of interest for our purpose of setting up a secure and encrypted Flask server.

The general idea is that when the client establishes a connection with the server and requests an encrypted connection, the server responds with its SSL Certificate. The certificate acts as identification for the server, as it includes the server name and domain. To ensure that the information provided by the server is correct, the certificate is cryptographically signed by a certificate authority, or CA. If the client knows and trusts the CA, it can confirm that the certificate signature indeed comes from this entity, and with this the client can be certain that the server it connected to is legitimate.

After the client verifies the certificate, it creates an encryption key to use for the communication with the server. To make sure that this key is sent securely to the server, it encrypts it using a public key that is included with the server certificate. The server is in possession of the private key that goes with that public key in the certificate, so it is the only party that is able to decrypt the package. From the point when the server receives the encryption key all traffic is encrypted with this key that only the client and server know.

From this summary you can probably guess that to implement TLS encryption we need two items: a server certificate, which includes a public key and is signed by a CA, and a private key that goes with the public key included in the certificate.

The Simplest Way To Do It

Flask, and more specifically Werkzeug, support the use of on-the-fly certificates, which are useful to quickly serve an application over HTTPS without having to mess with certificates. All you need to do, is add ssl_context='adhoc' to your call. As an example, below you can see the "Hello, World" Flask application from the official documentation, with TLS encryption added:

from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)

def hello():
    return "Hello World!"

if __name__ == "__main__":'adhoc')

This option is also available through the Flask CLI if you are using a Flask 1.x release:

$ flask run --cert=adhoc

To use ad hoc certificates with Flask, you need to install an additional dependency in your virtual environment:

$ pip install pyopenssl

When you run the script (or start with flask run if you prefer), you will notice that Flask indicates that it is running an https:// server:

$ python
 * Running on (Press CTRL+C to quit)

Simple, right? The problem is that browsers do not like this type of certificate, so they show a big and scary warning that you need to dismiss before you can access the application. Once you allow the browser to connect, you will have an encrypted connection, just like what you get from a server with a valid certificate, which make these ad hoc certificates convenient for quick & dirty tests, but not for any real use.

Self-Signed Certificates

A so called self-signed certificate is one where the signature is generated using the private key that is associated with that same certificate. I mentioned above that the client needs to "know and trust" the CA that signed a certificate, because that trust relationship is what allows the client to validate a server certificate. Web browsers and other HTTP clients come pre-configured with a list of known and trusted CAs, but obviously if you use a self-signed certificate the CA is not going to be known and validation will fail. That is exactly what happened with the ad hoc certificate we used in the previous section. If the web browser is unable to validate a server certificate, it will let you proceed and visit the site in question, but it will make sure you understand that you are doing it at your own risk.


But what is the risk, really? With the Flask server from the previous section you obviously trust yourself, so there is no risk to you. The problem is when users are presented with this warning when connecting to a site they do not directly know or control. In those cases, it is impossible for the user to know if the server is authentic or not, because anyone can generate certificates for any domain, as you will see below.

While self-signed certificates can be useful sometimes, the ad hoc certificates from Flask are not that great, because each time the server runs, a different certificate is generated on the fly through pyOpenSSL. When you are working with a self-signed certificate, it is better to have the same certificate used every time you launch your server, because that allows you to configure your browser to trust it, and that eliminates the security warnings.

You can generate self-signed certificates easily from the command line. All you need is to have openssl installed:

openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:4096 -nodes -out cert.pem -keyout key.pem -days 365

This command writes a new certificate in cert.pem with its corresponding private key in key.pem, with a validity period of 365 days. When you run this command, you will be asked a few questions. Below you can see in red how I answered them to generate a certificate for localhost:

Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
writing new private key to 'key.pem'
You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated
into your certificate request.
What you are about to enter is what is called a Distinguished Name or a DN.
There are quite a few fields but you can leave some blank
For some fields there will be a default value,
If you enter '.', the field will be left blank.
Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:US
State or Province Name (full name) [Some-State]:Oregon
Locality Name (eg, city) []:Portland
Organization Name (eg, company) [Internet Widgits Pty Ltd]:Miguel Grinberg Blog
Organizational Unit Name (eg, section) []:
Common Name (e.g. server FQDN or YOUR name) []:localhost
Email Address []:

We can now use this new self-signed certificate in our Flask application by setting the ssl_context argument in to a tuple with the filenames of the certificate and private key files:

from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)

def hello():
    return "Hello World!"

if __name__ == "__main__":'cert.pem', 'key.pem'))

Alternatively, you can add the --cert and --key options to the flask run command if you are using Flask 1.x or newer:

$ flask run --cert=cert.pem --key=key.pem

The browser will continue to complain about this certificate, but if you inspect it, you will see the information that you entered when you created it:


Using Production Web Servers

Of course we all know that the Flask development server is only good for development and testing. So how do we install an SSL certificate on a production server?

If you are using gunicorn, you can do this with command line arguments:

$ gunicorn --certfile cert.pem --keyfile key.pem -b hello:app

If you use nginx as a reverse proxy, then you can configure the certificate with nginx, and then nginx can "terminate" the encrypted connection, meaning that it will accept encrypted connections from the outside, but then use regular unencrypted connections to talk to your Flask backend. This is a very useful set up, as it frees your application from having to deal with certificates and encryption. The configuration items for nginx are as follows:

server {
    listen 443 ssl http2;
    ssl_certificate /path/to/cert.pem;
    ssl_certificate_key /path/to/key.pem;
    # ...

Another important item you need to consider is how are clients that connect through regular HTTP going to be handled. The best solution, in my opinion, is to respond to unencrypted requests with a redirect to the same URL but on HTTPS. For a Flask application, you can achieve that using the Flask-SSLify extension. With nginx, you can include another server block in your configuration:

server {
    listen 80;
    location / {
        return 301 https://$host$request_uri;

If you are using a different web server, check their documentation and you will likely find similar ways to create the configurations shown above.

Using "Real" Certificates

We have now explored all the options we have for self-signed certificates, but in all those cases, the limitation remains that web browsers are not going to trust those certificates unless you tell them to, so the best option for server certificates for a production site is to obtain them from one of these CAs that are well known and automatically trusted by all the web browsers.

When you request a certificate from a CA, this entity is going to verify that you are in control of your server and domain, but how this verification is done depends on the CA. If the server passes this verification then the CA will issue a certificate for it with its own signature and give it to you to install. The certificate is going to be good for a period of time that is usually not longer than a year. Most CAs charge money for these certificates, but there are a couple that offer them for free. The most popular free CA is called Let's Encrypt.

Getting a certificate from Let's Encrypt is fairly easy, since the whole process is automated. Assuming you are using an Ubuntu based server, you have to begin by installing their open source certbot tool on your server:

$ sudo apt-get install software-properties-common
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:certbot/certbot
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install certbot

And now you are ready to request the certificate using this utility. There are a few ways that certbot uses to verify your site. The "webroot" method is, in general, the easiest to implement. With this method, certbot adds some files in a directory that your web server exposes as static files, and then tries to access these files over HTTP, using the domain you are trying to generate a certificate for. If this test is successful, certbot knows that the server in which it is running it is associated with the correct domain, and with that it is satisfied and issues the certificate. The command to request a certificate with this method is as follows:

$ sudo certbot certonly --webroot -w /var/www/example -d

In this example, we are trying to generate a certificate for a domain, which uses the directory in /var/www/example as a static file root. Unfortunately a Flask based website does not have a static file root directory, all static files from the application are accessed with the /static prefix, at least when you use the default configuration, so more planning is necessary.

What certbot does to the static root directory is add a .well-known subdirectory, and then store some files in it. Then it uses a HTTP client to retrieve those files as If it can retrieve the files, then that is confirmation that your server is in full control of the domain name. For Flask and other applications that don't have a static file root directory, it is necessary to define one.

If you are using nginx as reverse proxy, you can take advantage of the powerful mappings that you can create in the configuration to give certbot a private directory where it can write its verification files. In the following example, I extended the HTTP server block shown in the previous section to send all Let's Encrypt related requests (which always begin with /.well-known/...) to a specific directory of your choice:

server {
    listen 80;
    location ~ /.well-known {
        root /path/to/letsencrypt/verification/directory;
    location / {
        return 301 https://$host$request_uri;

Then you can give this director to certbot:

$ sudo certbot certonly --webroot -w /path/to/letsencrypt/verification/directory -d

If certbot is able to verify the domain, it will write the certificate file as /etc/letsencrypt/live/ and the private key as /etc/letsencrypt/live/, and these are going to be valid for a period of 90 days.

To use this newly acquired certificate, you can enter the two filenames mentioned above in place of the self-signed files we used before, and this should work with any of the configurations described above. And of course you will also need to make your application available through the domain name that you registered, as that is the only way the browser will accept the certificate as valid.

Certbot is also used when you need to renew the certificates. To do that, you simply issue the following command:

$ sudo certbot renew

If there are any certificates in your system that are close to expire, the above command renews them, leaving new certificates in the same locations. You will likely need to restart your web server if you want the renewed certificates to be picked up.

Achieving an SSL A+ Grade

If you use a certificate from Let's Encrypt or another known CA for your production site and you are running a recent and maintained operating system on this server, you are likely very close to have a top-rated server in terms of SSL security. You can head over to the Qualys SSL Labs site and get a report to see where you stand.

Chances are you will still have some minor things to do. The report will indicate what areas you need to improve, but in general, I expect you'll be told that the options the server exposes for the encrypted communication are too wide, or too weak, leaving you open to known vulnerabilities.

One of the areas in which it is easy to make an improvement is in how the coefficients that are used during the encryption key exchange are generated, which usually have defaults that are fairly weak. In particular, the Diffie-Hellman coefficients take a considerable amount of time to be generated, so servers by default use smaller numbers to save time. But we can pre-generate strong coefficients and store them in a file, which then nginx can use. Using the openssl tool, you can run the following command:

openssl dhparam -out /path/to/dhparam.pem 2048

You can change the 2048 above for a 4096 if you want even stronger coefficients. This command is going to take some time to run, specially if your server does not have a lot of CPU power, but when it's done, you will have a dhparam.pem file with strong coefficients that you can plug into the ssl server block in nginx:

    ssl_dhparam /path/to/dhparam.pem;

Next, you will probably need to configure which ciphers the server allows for the encrypted communication. This is the list that I have on my server:


In this list, disabled ciphers are prefixed with a !. The SSL report will tell you if there are any ciphers that are not recommended. You will have to check from time to time to find out if new vulnerabilities have been discovered that require modifications to this list.

Below you can find my current nginx SSL configuration, which includes the above settings, plus a few more that I added to address warnings from the SSL report:

server {
    listen 443 ssl http2;
    ssl_certificate /path/to/cert.pem;
    ssl_certificate_key /path/to/key.pem;
    ssl_dhparam /path/to/dhparam.pem;
    ssl_protocols TLSv1.2;
    ssl_session_timeout 1d;
    ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:50m;
    ssl_stapling on;
    ssl_stapling_verify on;
    add_header Strict-Transport-Security max-age=15768000;
    # ...

You can see the results that I obtained for my site at the top of this article. If you are after 100% marks in all categories, you will have to add additional restrictions to your configuration, but this is going to limit the number of clients that can connect to your site. In general, older browsers and HTTP clients use ciphers that are not considered to be the strongest, but if you disable those, then these clients will not be able to connect. So you will basically need to compromise, and also routinely review the security reports and make updates as things change over time.

Unfortunately for the level of sophistication on these last SSL improvements you will need to use a professional grade web server, so if you don't want to go with nginx, you will need to find one that supports these settings, and the list is pretty small. I know Apache does, but besides that, I don't know any other.


So there you go, this is how you can implement top-of-the-line SSL security for your Flask application. Is there anything that I left out? Do you do things differently? Let me know below in the comments!

Become a Patron!

Hello, and thank you for visiting my blog! If you enjoyed this article, please consider supporting my work on this blog on Patreon!

  • #76 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Seyla: What do you mean by "CONNECT verb"? What do you need this for? What response status do you receive if not the expected one(s)?

  • #77 Seyla said

    I see on "Microsoft Message Analyzer" tool the event "GET" without "200" status and without Response Header.
    Verb: GET
    RequestHeaders: GET / HTTP/1.1
    Accept: /
    Connection: Keep-Alive
    Status: 0 0x 00000000

    <hr />

    And If I try to access a Browser, I see:

    The connection for this site is not secure sent an invalid response.
    Try running Windows Network Diagnostics.

  • #78 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Seyla: are you running your web server with SSL enabled?

  • #79 Morten Sickel said

    Thanks! Exactly what I needed to get my flask development system up and running as https - needed to test geolocation.

  • #80 Arjun Jain said

    Hi Miguel,

    When I generate a self-signed certificate and key, I am asked about the common name (e.g. server name) . If my Flask app is running on host = '' and port is '8800', what should I provide for the common name?


  • #81 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Arjun: is not a valid IP address, it is used to say that you want the application to listen on all the network interfaces available in your system. So you need to find out what IP address(es) your computer was assigned. A certificate for an IP address is not very common, but I believe the common name should be the IP address.

  • #82 Aly said

    Great post and description

  • #83 Phil said

    Hi Miguel,

    I am sitting behind a corporate proxy, which injects self-signed certificates. So I always need to verify against the company's certificates. Usually no big deal as I have the companies certs installed for verification or in fact have the company's cert.pem file.

    But now I have created my personal certificate and I though I can simply merge the personal certificate cert.pem with my company's cert.pem file.

    If I do so the Flask dev server complains:

    ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CA_MD_TOO_WEAK] ca md too weak (_ssl.c:4022)

    1) Is my assumption that I can merge (really concatenate) the two cert.pem files principally correct? (I obviously don't hold the key file for the company's certificates.)
    2) If I understand my google search results correctly, the error indicates that the security level, with which my personal certificate was created, is not matching the security level with which the companies certs have been generated. Any idea how I can check and fix this issue?

    Thanks Miguel! Keep up your great work. Your blog and YT videos are a valuable resource!

  • #84 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Phil: the error is not from Flask, it is from the ssl package from Python. You generated a certificate that is signed with md5, which is insecure.

  • #85 Pere Vilás Marí said

    If someone is thinking how to make https call on his local machine, specially with hsts enabled, I recommend mkcert:

    Basically, it creates a "fake" CA authority on your machine and you can use auto signed certificates without validation issues.

  • #86 Matheus said

    Thank you for the amazing guide.

    It works fine for me when I use ssl_context=('cert.pem', 'key.pem'), however in this case the .css and .js files called from my index.html cannot be found anymore using the usual path. It works fine if I use ssl_context=None in my main flask app.

  • #87 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Matheus: when you have this type of problem, a verbal description of what you think is happening is not very useful. You have to provide the exact error messages that you get, either in the browser or in the terminal running the Flask application.

  • #88 Sorin Goldenberg said

    Thank you for your tutorial.
    I am following it, but no matter the option, on my local I get
    Running on
    instead of
    Running on

  • #89 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Sorin: How can I troubleshoot your problem if you don't provide any information? Saying that no matter what options you use is really not useful. I mean, we agree that you are doing something wrong, right? Explain what you tried, then maybe I can tell you what the mistake is.

  • #90 Ashburry said

    I am unable to get SSL working in an production environment using gevent.

    AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'wrap_socket'

    It is clearly expecting somekind of object but I cannot find out what to actually put here. I have also tried on the command line, but I get import errors because I am using the 'flask.exe' command instead of just 'py -3'. Any help would be appreciated. Also I had to use the openssl.exe in "c:\program files\OpenSSL-win64\bin" directory.

  • #91 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Ashburry: I have never used SSL with gevent, so I can't really tell you what's wrong. The error suggests you are passing a string in a place where you should be passing an SSLContext instance, but impossible for me to know if this problem is yours or in gevent.

  • #92 David Terwilliger said

    I think I posted here {don't see the comment} about having trouble getting ngix to really work

    I had to configure additional keys - incase this helps people in the future. I had specified the wrong sets
    ngix needed

    server {
    listen 443 ssl http2;
    server_name -----;
    ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/-----/fullchain.pem;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/-----/privkey.pem;
    location ~ /.well-known {
    root /data/certs;

    location / {
    include proxy_params;
    proxy_pass http://unix:/data/microblog/micro/app.sock;

  • #93 Miguel Grinberg said

    @David: I don't think this is a complete configuration. The .well-known section is normally under the non-encrypted interface, not sure why you have it in the SSL section. Other than that, I'm not sure what's different between your solution and the one I present in this article. Can you clarify?

  • #94 Louis Cloete said

    Hi Miguel! Thanks for this excellent tutorial on writing a Flask web app. This is really a great series of posts.

    I have a question on renewing Let's Encrypt certificates. How do you ensure the certificate does not get out of date? It should be renewed every 90 days, but if that's not automated somehow, humans are bound to forget. Is something like a cron job running every 85 days, which first renews the certificate and then restarts the server, a good solution? Or are there other better ways to do so?

  • #95 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Louis: If allowed by your method of verification, let's encrypt configures a scheduled job that renews your certificate.

  • #96 Brian Osborne said

    I'm running Flask on my Mac OS laptop as a "sandbox" so the host is localhost or and I've created the *pem files as you're suggesting, and run() looks like:

    The *pem files are in the Flask root dir, but this is not working, I see:


    in the *log file. And in the Web page:

    This site can’t provide a secure connection127.0.0.1 sent an invalid response.

    Do you have any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks again.

  • #97 Miguel Grinberg said

    @Brian: Does the common name in your self-signed cert matches the hostname you are using when accessing the app? I have used localhost here in all my examples, so I'm surprised to see in your errors. Where is that coming from? Also, consider that several years have passed since I wrote this, and browsers are now more strict in their requirements. Using self-signed certificates isn't really a viable option, there is really no point when LetsEncrypt gives you free certificates that are accepted by all web browsers.

  • #98 xzssyy said


  • #99 Mayowa Osibodu said

    Super helpful guide!! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Leave a Comment